The Department of Education has released DepEd Memorandum No. 003, s. 2026, establishing the official Guidelines on the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of the Pilot Implementation of the Strengthened Senior High School (SSHS) Curriculum. This memorandum represents a major operational framework supporting the improvement of the Philippine Senior High School system through data-driven analysis, transparent reporting structures, and systematic assessment processes. By focusing on monitoring and evaluation mechanisms covering 891 pilot schools nationwide, the memorandum aims to ensure that the SSHS Curriculum reform is implemented with consistency, fidelity, and accountability across all levels of DepEd governance.

The memorandum responds to the national directive to rationalize and improve the SHS curriculum. It provides structure to the change process by clarifying how data will be collected, interpreted, validated, and used to refine policy before the SSHS curriculum is fully rolled out across the country. This detailed guide explores the purpose, scope, components, tools, and responsibilities embedded in the M&E system.
Click here to download SSHS Implementation M&E Plan_V.10.1
Rationale Behind the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
The SSHS Curriculum reform was initiated to streamline subject offerings, broaden learner choice, and strengthen alignment with both industry needs and national development goals. To ensure the reform achieves its intended outcomes, DepEd mandates a comprehensive M&E system that does more than track compliance. It must:
-
assess curriculum delivery in real time,
-
capture learner experiences and progress,
-
evaluate teacher preparedness and training needs,
-
monitor available resources and gaps,
-
provide actionable recommendations, and
-
support continuous system improvement.
The rationale highlights the importance of evidence-based decision-making. Instead of relying on assumptions or anecdotal reports, DepEd emphasizes the necessity of standardized tools, systematic data collection, and consistent reporting cycles. These processes enable both centralized and localized insights, helping DepEd respond to the diverse contexts across regions and schools.
Purpose of the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
The purpose of the M&E guidelines is to create a unified system across all participating DepEd offices and pilot schools. The framework aims to:
-
Provide insights into necessary support mechanisms for teachers, school leaders, and system implementers.
-
Identify potential challenges or bottlenecks early to allow for targeted interventions.
-
Establish validity and consistency through standardized data collection tools and processes.
-
Guide policy refinements and program adjustments before the curriculum is fully implemented nationwide.
By clarifying the purpose, DepEd ensures that each data point gathered contributes meaningfully to improving the SSHS curriculum.
Scope of Implementation
The guidelines apply to:
-
891 pilot schools nationwide,
-
Schools Division Offices (SDOs),
-
Regional Offices (ROs), and
-
Central Office bureaus and services.
The pilot implementation covers Grade 11 learners in SY 2025–2026, who will continue as Grade 12 learners under the SSHS Curriculum in SY 2026–2027. Other Grade 12 learners from non-pilot schools remain under the existing SHS curriculum. This staggered implementation ensures controlled testing, monitoring, and refinement of the strengthened curriculum.
The SSHS Theory of Change
DepEd’s Theory of Change articulates four key outcomes:
1. Flexible Learner Pathways
The SSHS Curriculum is designed to simplify options and provide stackable learning opportunities. Students receive career guidance and support in selecting tracks aligned with their interests, goals, and strengths.
2. Improved Industry Alignment
Stronger partnerships with industries ensure that elective courses and work immersion opportunities mirror real workforce needs. This involves greater collaboration with industry partners in shaping curriculum delivery.
3. Improved School-Level Delivery
This outcome focuses on teacher capacity-building, access to learning resources, and improved instructional practices. Schools must provide a supportive learning environment that promotes both academic excellence and holistic development.
4. Improved Stakeholder Alignment
Effective communication among DepEd offices, schools, teachers, families, and industries ensures shared accountability. This reinforces system-wide coherence and strengthens the reform’s overall impact.
Monitoring: Tools and Data Sources
Primary Data Sources
1. Rapid Check-In Survey
Conducted during the first quarter of implementation, this stakeholder feedback tool collects insights from:
It assesses preparedness, learning resource availability, curriculum delivery quality, and overall satisfaction.
2. SHS Monitoring Tool (SHS MT)
Accomplished at the start of every semester, the SHS MT tracks:
Semestral submissions allow for continuous monitoring and timely adjustments.
3. Industry Partnership Mapping Tool
This tool documents and evaluates partnerships between schools and industry sectors. It helps identify whether electives align with workforce demands and whether students gain meaningful hands-on experiences.
Secondary Data Sources
These include established assessment tools and administrative data systems:
-
Classroom Observation Tool (COT)
-
National Achievement Test (NAT Grade 10 and Grade 12)
-
National Career Assessment Examination (NCAE)
-
Enhanced Basic Education Information System (EBEIS)
-
Learner Information System (LIS)
-
School forms such as eSF7 and SF10
Using multiple data sources allows DepEd to validate findings and gain a comprehensive view of school performance and learner progress.
Evaluation Framework and Timeline
The evaluation is divided into three phases:
Baseline Evaluation (SY 2025–2026)
Establishes the starting point by collecting data on learner competencies, school resources, and prior achievements.
Midline Evaluation (Q1 2026)
Assesses the fidelity of implementation and identifies operational challenges. Methods include key informant interviews, focus group discussions, surveys, and analysis of administrative data.
End-Line Assessment (2027)
Measures the curriculum’s impact on learner outcomes, particularly through NAT Grade 12 results.
Each phase supports systematic decision-making for policy refinement.
Roles and Responsibilities Across DepEd Levels
Central Office
Responsible for developing M&E tools, conducting regular monitoring, managing evaluations, consolidating national reports, analyzing data, and coordinating with external evaluators such as PIDS.
Regional Offices
Conduct regional monitoring, consolidate SDO reports, provide technical assistance, and designate Regional SSHS focal persons.
Schools Division Offices
Handle data validation, conduct division-level monitoring, assist schools with implementation challenges, and designate division focal persons.
Schools
Ensure accurate data collection and submission, supervise school-level processes, maintain records, and use M&E results to improve instruction and school planning.
Funding and Data Privacy Compliance
Funding for M&E activities may come from:
-
Basic Education Curriculum (BEC) funds,
-
Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (MOOE),
-
and the Monitoring and Evaluation Office (MEO) budget.
All activities must comply with the Data Privacy Act of 2012, ensuring secure handling of sensitive information.