Foreign Ownership of Basic Education Institutions in the Philippines: A Double-Edged Sword

Foreign Ownership of Basic Education Institutions in the Philippines: A Double-Edged Sword

The debate on foreign ownership of basic education institutions in the Philippines has been a hot topic recently. This article aims to shed light on the advantages and disadvantages of this issue, and relate it to the current news in the Philippines.

Advantages of Foreign Ownership

Internationalization and Global Competitiveness

The internationalization of the Philippine education sector could potentially position the country favorably within the ASEAN region. The use of English as the official language in the ASEAN region could further boost this advantage. Foreign ownership could also lead to an increase in the demand for higher education due to the mobility of highly skilled individuals across the region.

Foreign Ownership of Basic Education Institutions in the Philippines: A Double-Edged Sword

Quality of Education

Foreign ownership could potentially improve the quality of education in the Philippines. As pointed out by Iloilo 1st District Rep. Janette Garin, allowing foreign ownership could provide students with better education. Exposure to different methods of teaching, particularly those from foreign institutions, could enhance the learning experience of students.

Disadvantages of Foreign Ownership

Threat to National Identity and Security

The Department of Education (DepEd) has expressed strong objections to allowing full control and administration of basic education institutions in the Philippines to foreign entities. They argue that this could pose a threat to students’ sense of nationality and the country’s national security.

Risk to Filipino Culture and Values

There are concerns that allowing foreigners to control and administer educational institutions may be prejudicial to Filipino culture, values, and spiritual matters. This could potentially dilute fundamental aspects of Filipino identity.

Current News on the Matter

Recently, the Senate reiterated that it will not open up basic educational institutions to foreign ownership. This decision was made amidst discussions on Resolution of Both Houses No. Meanwhile, a progressive teachers’ group warned that historical revisionism may worsen if foreign capitalist educators are allowed to fully own educational institutions in the Philippines.

In conclusion, while foreign ownership of basic education institutions in the Philippines could potentially improve the quality of education and make it globally competitive, it also poses significant risks to national identity, security, and Filipino culture and values. As such, this issue requires careful consideration and balanced decision-making.